An Upside-Down Food Pyramid & New "Healthy" Labels Won't Save Us (w/ EC Synkowski)
5 Big Ideas, 3 Reflection Questions, 1 Takeaway
We explore why the new USDA dietary guidelines and FDA “healthy” food labels—despite good intentions—won’t actually move the needle on America’s health crisis. You’ll discover why the problem isn’t a lack of guidance but too much noise, why no one follows the guidelines we already have, and what’s really driving our epidemic of poor health.
This is a special crossover episode from The Consistency Project, featuring EC Synkowski breaking down both the upside-down food pyramid and the new labeling rules to reveal the same fundamental flaw: until someone changes the food environment, these systems are just adding confusion to an already overwhelming conversation about nutrition.
Listen Now
Chase Club (Ad Free)
🖐 5 BIG IDEAS
1. The Problem Isn’t the Guidelines - It’s That Nobody Follows Them
Here’s the uncomfortable truth: 74% of Americans are overweight or obese, meaning most people aren’t even meeting the first guideline recommendation about eating the right amount of calories. Less than 10% of Americans meet basic fruit and vegetable recommendations. Fewer than 1% of people in the UK follow their dietary guidelines.
The new USDA guidelines could be perfect on paper and it wouldn’t matter. The last ten versions of dietary guidelines have all failed to reduce chronic disease, and this version won’t be different—not because the science is wrong, but because the systems we’ve built don’t actually influence how people eat.
EC points out that in her entire career—working at CrossFit and running OptimizeMe Nutrition for eight years—she’d never been asked about the USDA dietary guidelines until this year. Meanwhile, she fields constant questions about what the Glucose Goddess says, or Peter Attia, or Stacy Sims. Viral social media influencers shape dietary choices far more than government recommendations ever will.
2. Good Intentions, Impractical Execution
Both the dietary guidelines and the new “healthy” labels suffer from the same fatal flaw: they were created by people who don’t work with actual clients trying to make real-world food choices.
The new 10-page USDA summary tells people to keep saturated fat under 10% of calories. But how many people can calculate that? How many know which foods increase or decrease that number? Less than 1%. The guidelines give protein recommendations in grams per kilogram of body weight—a calculation most Americans can’t or won’t do.
The FDA’s new “healthy” label requires foods to contain “⅔ cup equivalent” of dairy or specific amounts of food groups using their complicated equivalency system. These aren’t tools designed for use—they’re bureaucratic documents that check boxes without actually helping anyone eat better.
If you want to make nutrition accessible, you give people a simple picture of what a plate should look like, show them actual serving sizes, and stop requiring math degrees to follow basic recommendations.
3. More Information Is Part of the Problem
The government keeps treating nutrition like an information deficit problem. Give people better guidelines, clearer labels, more detailed breakdowns of nutrients—and surely they’ll eat better, right?
Wrong.
We already have nutrition labels. We have My Plate. We have decades of dietary guidelines. And yet consumption patterns haven’t changed—we’re still eating too much ultra-processed food and not nearly enough fruits and vegetables.
The FDA even acknowledges this paradox in their own documentation: they recognize that any food can be part of a healthy diet and that you shouldn’t limit yourself only to foods with the “healthy” label. But if the label doesn’t actually define healthy eating, why are we spending millions of dollars creating it?
What we’re creating isn’t clarity—it’s noise. More chatter in an already deafening conversation about saturated fat, added sugar, emerging evidence, and conflicting recommendations that leave people more confused than when they started.
4. The Real Culprit Is the Food Environment, Not the Documents
Here’s what actually determines what Americans eat: grocery store layouts that put ultra-processed foods at eye level and in checkout lanes. School lunch programs built around cheap, shelf-stable products. Marketing budgets for processed foods that dwarf anything spent on promoting whole foods. Convenience that makes it easier to grab a bag of chips than wash and cut vegetables.
Until someone actually changes the food environment—the physical spaces where people make choices, the ease of accessing certain foods, the economic incentives driving food production—no amount of better paperwork will matter.
EC suggests a radical but practical idea: reorganize grocery stores to physically separate ultra-processed foods into their own section, limit the size of that section, and remove UPF from checkout lanes. Make it harder to overconsume the foods we need to minimize. Use the environment to shape behavior, not just more labels that people already ignore.
Millions of dollars and countless hours go into creating these guidelines and labeling systems. Imagine if even a fraction of that effort went into actually changing what’s accessible, affordable, and convenient.
5. You Already Have Everything You Need
The good news that gets lost in all this noise? You don’t need to wait for better guidelines or clearer labels to improve your health.
You already have the knowledge: eat whole foods in proper amounts more often than you don’t. The boring basics. Make simple choices consistently. That’s the entire game.
The upside-down food pyramid, the “healthy” labels, the endless debates about saturated fat and added sugar—it’s all just noise. And you have full permission to shut it out.
This isn’t about ignoring science or rejecting evidence-based nutrition. It’s about recognizing that once you understand the fundamentals, the marginal returns on consuming more nutrition information drop to nearly zero. What matters is execution, not optimization. Consistency, not perfection.
Your kitchen, your choices, your environment—that’s what you can control. Start there, and let the government worry about their documents.
🤔 3 REFLECTION QUESTIONS
1. Where have you been waiting for better information instead of acting on what you already know?
Think about the last time you felt confused about nutrition. Was it really a lack of knowledge, or were you overwhelmed by conflicting information and looking for the “perfect” answer before taking action? What would it look like to strip away all the noise and just focus on the boring basics for the next 30 days?
2. What’s one change you could make to your food environment this week?
You can’t redesign the grocery store, but you can redesign your kitchen. What ultra-processed foods are at eye level in your pantry? What’s in your checkout lane (the path from your front door to your kitchen)? What could you make more accessible, and what could you make less convenient?
3. Are you following basic recommendations consistently before worrying about optimization?
Before you stress about saturated fat percentages or whether something has a “healthy” label, ask yourself: Am I eating the right number of calories for my goals most days? Am I getting enough fruits and vegetables? Am I choosing whole foods more often than processed ones? If the answer to any of these is no, that’s your focus—not the latest guidelines.
🔑 1 KEY TAKEAWAY
Guidelines and labels are noise. The solution is already in your hands.
We can spend billions of dollars creating perfect dietary guidelines and comprehensive labeling systems, but none of it matters if the food environment doesn’t change—and until it does, individual agency is your most powerful tool.
The path forward isn’t about waiting for the next set of recommendations or a better definition of “healthy.” It’s about developing the awareness to recognize what actually matters (whole foods, proper amounts, consistency), the intention to prioritize those things in your own life, and the discipline to keep making simple choices even when the noise gets louder.
EC’s work on The Consistency Project exists precisely because the basics get buried under complexity. Eat real food. Don’t eat too much. Move your body. Sleep enough. These truths don’t change whether the food pyramid is right-side up or upside-down.
The clearer you get on that, the easier it becomes to ignore everything else. Because ultimately, that’s all the new guidelines and labels are—more noise in a conversation that desperately needs less of it, not more.
You have full permission to shut it out and get back to what works.
Chasing Excellence is an audience-supported project. To go deeper & to help us do even more, consider:
Subscribing to get our free posts or upgrading to receive the Daily Chase posts & the ChaseTracker app.
Grabbing one of our books: Chasing Excellence, Unlocking Potential, or The ABCs of Being Happy & Healthy.
Supporting one of our fantastic show sponsors.
Thanks for sharing these convos, Patrick! We ❤️ EC! I would be curious to know how she thinks we can go about changing the food environment!